The SRP assignment is important, which is why we at Task Correction receive many inquiries about proofreading of the particular study project. Pupils in secondary education would like to correct their SRP so that language errors do not reduce, and therefore many people search for “srp proofing”, “proofreading srp assignment”, “correct srp”, “srp proofing “,” help for srp “and similar search phrases.
At Task Correction we live by correcting study tasks, and we understand why you as a student want to submit a flawless and fluid SRP project. But in fact, spelling and phrasing ability is not a specific academic goal in the field of study. The ability for professional dissemination plays a part in the assessment, but linguistic correctness in itself is not a decisive element (SRP assignments written in the subject excepted).
At Task Correction, we have chosen to focus on proofreading of assignments written in higher education, and therefore we do not correct SRP assignments. But we would like to give you a few good tips and information about SRP.
How to fix your SRP?
You can do a whole lot yourself to correct your SRP. We’ve put together a number of SRP proofing tips here, but let’s just repeat them in short form.
Set aside plenty of time to correct your SRP – proofing should be done slowly and thoroughly.
Enlarge the words in the SRP before correcting it, either by changing the font size or by zooming the entire document up 200-300%.
Read the text aloud to yourself, slowly and with clear pronunciation – you can certainly hear some errors.
Use the spell checker – it probably marks many errors that are not errors, but it also captures many typos and real misspellings.
Pay attention to the classic errors: present, composition and punctuation.
What should be able to do in an SRP?
The SRP assignment is the final step in an educational course where you have been continuously taught to write major written assignments – ie academic writing.
Writing academically means that you have mastered the use of auxiliary texts such as table of contents and bibliography, and that you can write in explanatory, analytical, interpretative, evaluative and discussion forms.
The field of study project has the status of an A-subject and a ‘curriculum’ belongs to a curriculum where the objectives of the course are defined. Your SRP is assessed on the following academic objectives:
- The ability to engage in professional development and acquire new academic areas
- The ability to select, apply and combine different approaches and methods
- Master academic goals in the participating subjects
- Selecting, processing and structuring relevant material
- The ability for professional dissemination
- Answer a task satisfactorily
- Master academic forms of preparation.
If you achieve maximum within all goals, you get the grade 12. But you can also get 12 for your SRP, even if you have small shortcomings within selected goals.
The good SRP task
The good SRP assignment is a task that meets the academic objectives of the subject (see above). But there will always be an element of subjectivity in the assessment of a task, because as a teacher, the academic goals are weighted differently. This is how it is when people judge the task. However, it is important to emphasize that precisely the academic objectives and the fact that there are two people reading and assessing your SRP ensure that in most cases the grade is an accurate expression of the level of the assignment.
At Odder Gymnasium, a number of study direction projects have been compiled with various subject combinations, which are believed to be successful. The assignments give you an impression of what a completed assignment looks like and what it takes to get a good grade. See them here.
You can also find examples of srp tasks.
How to do it when assessing the SRP
The Ministry of Education decides which of your supervisors should judge your assignment and who should be the censor of the assignment. An SRP project is typically two-subject, and the examiner and supervisor each represent their own subject. This ensures that the assessors are expertly dressed to assess the level of both participating subjects.
Voting typically takes place over the phone, as the examiner and supervisor usually come from two different parts of the country. The examiner initially contacts the supervisor and an appointment is made for voting. Up to the voting, each person reads and assesses the assignment and writes some key words and remarks about the final telephone conversation in which the grade must be determined.
It is always the censor who puts out a character, typically accompanied by a brief rationale. However, it is important to emphasize that ‘laying out’ must be understood literally. Since the censor is only an expert in one subject, the character of the censor must be understood as a play. The examiner is not able to accurately judge the level of the entire assignment, all the while he / she is typically only an expert in one subject.
Once the censor has played out, the supervisor comes up with his bid for a character, possibly accompanied by a brief rationale.
If the examiner and supervisor agree on the grade, you can end the conversation relatively quickly. If, on the other hand, the examiner and supervisor disagree, a deeper discussion of the assignment is discussed, where good and less good things are discussed.
If you cannot agree on the final character then you will typically meet in the middle – if the censor and supervisor are probably two characters apart. However, it must be pointed out that this is extremely rare. Typically, one character separates the parties, and if that is also the case after a discussion of the SRP, the nature of the censor will decide the matter.
The censor is completely impartial and has no interest in the student getting neither a higher nor a lower grade. Therefore, the character of the censor is considered to be most credible, and it is therefore the censor that ultimately determines the grade.